This website has long been a critic of the useless Home Secretary, Amber Rudd. That she was wholly unsuited to the high office of Home Secretary was obvious to most. Perhaps one day she will thrive as a middle-manager in a zombie company somewhere. It astounds me that she got as far as she did.

This was the woman who referred to the terrorist attack upon the Ariana Grande concert in Manchester as a mere “incident” and whose more recent response to the use of chemical agents on the streets of this country was lamentable.

It would appear that, having denied knowledge of specific targets for the removal of illegal immigrants, Rudd was well aware of them. Why bother to deny it? At least Donald Trump won’t have to meet her when he visits London in July.

Advertisements

Cambridge donor BP urges university to keep fossil fuel investments

FILE PHOTO: BP's Chief Executive Bob Dudley speaks to the media after year-end results were announced at the energy company's headquarters in London

LONDON (Reuters) – BP <BP.L> Chief Executive Bob Dudley on Tuesday urged Cambridge University not to yield to pressure from hundreds of students and academics to cut its investments in fossil fuels and pointed to BP’s donations to the university.

“We donate and do a lot of research at Cambridge so I hope they come to their senses,” Dudley told the AIPN International Petroleum Summit.

BP did not immediately disclose how much it has been donating to the university.

In 2015/16 it gave grants worth around 1.4 million pounds, according to Cambridge, and in 2000 a 22 million pound donation from BP helped to create the BP Institute for Multiphase Flow, which focuses on research in surfaces and particles and fluid dynamics.

Cambridge’s University Council is expected to decide within weeks whether it will change its investments after years of campaigning by students and academics.

Last week, around 350 Cambridge academics signed a letter to the university and its colleges, which enjoy a certain degree of independence from the university’s central administration, to excise fossil fuel investments from the roughly 6.3 billion pounds at their disposal.

“We … call on the university’s investment office to immediately freeze any new investments in fossil fuel companies, and to divest from direct ownership and any commingled funds that include fossil fuel public equities and corporate bonds within five years,” an open letter said.

Signatories include chemist David King, who was Britain’s Special Representative for Climate Change until last year following his seven-year stint as the government’s Chief Scientific Advisor.

Cambridge had no immediate response to Dudley’s comments.

Activists in the Cambridge Zero Carbon Society said they received a letter on Monday from vice-Chancellor Stephen Toope which stated the university had a leadership role in understanding and tackling climate change.

“The objective … is to promote and execute urgent and tangible action to deliver a carbon neutral future. The University is already taking steps that must be further expanded in the areas of its investments, research, education, estate and policy decisions,” Toope’s letter said.

When asked about Dudley’s comment, a spokesman for the activist group said “if the University is unable to divest its endowment in line with the democratic wishes of students and staff due to these threats, then there is no longer academic independence at Cambridge.”

The world’s top oil and gas companies are facing rising pressure from investors to shift to cleaner energy and renewables in order to meet international targets to sharply reduce carbon emissions by the end of the century.

Dudley said that BP was going to invest around $500 million (358 million pounds) per year in renewables in the coming years, but that the world will need oil and gas “for many years to come.”

Standard

COMMENT: I have never understood the popularity of Amber Rudd amongst Tory activists. This is the incompetent who referred to the terrorist attack upon the Ariana Grande concert in Manchester as a mere “incident” and who has now handed Labour – rife with the stench and squalor of Anti-Semitism – the advantage over the Windrush generation. Politics? You couldn’t make it up!